DemoAcme is a fictional company on a reserved .example domain. Every source, value and number on this page is illustrative, produced by the real methodology from invented evidence.
Acme
UnclaimedSoftware for running enterprise operations: planning, approvals and service delivery in one system.
An estimate of how reliably the assessed digital ecosystem represents Acme: the accuracy of what people and machines encounter, weighted by how much each fact matters and how often each surface is seen. Shown as an index until calibrated.
The Score measures how reliably Acme is represented. Evidence Coverage is how much of its reality could be assessed confidently.
- 3material gaps
- 8conflicting claims
- 3unresolved
14 claims · 63 observations · 17 sources · Scored 14 Sept 2026 · Methodology drs-0.2
Diagnostics
How diagnostics are measuredSix views that explain the Score. They are not averaged into it. Consistency in particular never raises a Score: sources can agree on something wrong.
- AccuracyAre important company facts represented correctly?71High confidence · 10 claims
- ConsistencyDo important sources agree?75High confidence · 10 claims
- EvidenceAre important company claims sufficiently supported?69High confidence · 10 claims
- AuthorityAre credible and authoritative sources reinforcing those claims?61High confidence · 10 claims
- DiscoverabilityCan the right company, products and information actually be found?42High confidence · 1 claim
- RepresentationDo search and AI systems describe the company correctly?59High confidence · 8 claims
The strongest findings
All 14 claims and their evidenceWhat was observed, and where. Open a finding to see every source behind it.
-
Described as a tool for small teams
Acme describes its customers as large enterprises. An analyst report agrees. Both AI assistants tested, and a software review site, describe Acme as a tool for small and mid-sized teams.
Inspect evidenceHide evidenceClaim:
Acme → target_customer → Large enterprises (1,000+ employees)Not yet confirmed by the companyTarget customer · Acme states: “Large enterprises (1,000+ employees)” Source Representation Assessment Exposure Captured Company websiteObserved Large enterprises (1,000+ employees) Current High 1 Sept 2026 LinkedIn company pageObserved Enterprise operations teams Current Medium 30 Aug 2026 Analyst reportEvidenced Enterprise operations teams Aligned Low 28 Aug 2026 Software review siteEvidenced Small and mid-sized teams Conflict Medium 26 Aug 2026 AI answer · assistant APerceived Small teams and startups Conflict High 12 Sept 2026 AI answer · assistant BPerceived Small and mid-sized businesses Conflict High 10 Sept 2026 Decision: Potential gap · Misunderstood · P(stated value is true) 85% · representations accurate 44% · 1 independent supporting origin
-
Category mismatch
The Acme website positions Acme as an enterprise operations platform. Several prominent external sources, and one of the AI assistants tested, still classify it primarily as workflow-management software.
Inspect evidenceHide evidenceClaim:
Acme → primary_category → Enterprise operations platformNot yet confirmed by the companyPrimary category · Acme states: “Enterprise operations platform” Source Representation Assessment Exposure Captured Company websiteObserved Enterprise operations platform Current High 13 Sept 2026 LinkedIn company pageObserved Enterprise operations platform Current Medium 11 Sept 2026 Industry publicationEvidenced · copies Crunchbase Workflow software Potentially stale Medium 2 Sept 2026 CrunchbaseEvidenced Workflow-management software Potentially stale Medium 5 Sept 2026 Search resultsPerceived Enterprise operations platform Aligned High 1 Sept 2026 AI answer · assistant APerceived Workflow-management software Conflict High 5 Sept 2026 AI answer · assistant BPerceived Enterprise operations platform Aligned High 3 Sept 2026 Decision: Potential gap · Conflicting · P(stated value is true) 82% · representations accurate 61% · 0 independent supporting origins · flagged for human review
-
Acme Flow still described as beta
Acme’s website and newsroom describe Acme Flow as generally available since March 2026. A software review site, search results and one AI assistant still describe it as in beta with a waitlist.
Inspect evidenceHide evidenceClaim:
Acme Flow → product_available → Generally availableNot yet confirmed by the companyAcme Flow availability · Acme states: “Generally available” Source Representation Assessment Exposure Captured Company websiteObserved Generally available Current High 4 Sept 2026 Company newsroomObserved Generally available since March 2026 Current Low 2 Sept 2026 Software review siteEvidenced Beta Potentially stale Medium 25 Aug 2026 Search resultsPerceived Acme Flow (beta) Potentially stale High 29 Aug 2026 AI answer · assistant APerceived In beta, waitlist only Potentially stale High 27 Aug 2026 AI answer · assistant BPerceived Generally available Aligned High 13 Sept 2026 Decision: Potential gap · Stale · P(stated value is true) 81% · representations accurate 42% · 0 independent supporting origins · flagged for human review
-
Founder information
Public sources disagree about Acme’s founding team. Some name Jane Smith and Tomas Berg, others name Tomas Berg alone. Acme’s own website does not name its founders, so there is no stated value to measure against.
Inspect evidenceHide evidenceClaim:
Acme → founded_by → (not stated)Not yet confirmed by the companyFounding team · Acme states: “—” Source Representation Assessment Exposure Captured Company websiteObserved Not stated Not found High 10 Sept 2026 Industry publicationEvidenced Tomas Berg Conflict Medium 6 Sept 2026 CrunchbaseEvidenced Jane Smith, Tomas Berg Aligned Medium 8 Sept 2026 AI answer · assistant APerceived Jane Smith and Tomas Berg Aligned High 4 Sept 2026 AI answer · assistant BPerceived Tomas Berg Conflict High 2 Sept 2026 Decision: Unresolved · P(stated value is true) 48% · representations accurate 42% · 1 independent supporting origin · flagged for human review
-
CEO information
Current leadership is represented consistently across owned and authoritative external sources, including search and both AI assistants tested.
Inspect evidenceHide evidenceClaim:
Acme → ceo → Maria LindqvistNot yet confirmed by the companyChief executive · Acme states: “Maria Lindqvist” Source Representation Assessment Exposure Captured Company websiteObserved Maria Lindqvist Current High 7 Sept 2026 LinkedIn company pageObserved Maria Lindqvist Current Medium 5 Sept 2026 Business pressEvidenced Maria Lindqvist Aligned Medium 3 Sept 2026 CrunchbaseEvidenced Maria Lindqvist Aligned Medium 1 Sept 2026 Search knowledge panelPerceived Maria Lindqvist Aligned High 30 Aug 2026 AI answer · assistant APerceived Maria Lindqvist Aligned High 28 Aug 2026 AI answer · assistant BPerceived Maria Lindqvist Aligned High 26 Aug 2026 Decision: Aligned · P(stated value is true) 95% · representations accurate 95% · 2 independent supporting origins
Your Score is a snapshot. The internet keeps changing.
SIGNAL continuously watches search, brand, mentions, evidence and AI representation, identifies important changes, and tells you what deserves action.
Work at Acme? Claim the company.
Verify important facts, resolve unknowns and improve Evidence Coverage. Claiming is free, and it is how Business Reality gets established: the Score can only measure against facts someone at the company has confirmed.
- Confirm or correct the 8 claims that are unresolved or disputed
- Your answers stay private unless Acme chooses to publish them
- Colleagues can join once the company is claimed
Your claim is pending Verify to start confirming facts.
Continue verificationIn review We’ll verify by hand, because it is not at @acme.example. We’ll email you.
Help resolve these claims
You are verified as . Each answer becomes evidence about Business Reality, reviewed by an analyst before it counts fully. It never sets the Score directly. Answers are private to Acme unless you choose to publish them.
Projection from your answers, using the published methodology. The Score is not recalculated live: answers apply at the next Score run. Confirming a fact can lower the Score, when the wider web disagrees with it. That is the Score working.
Benchmarks
How Acme compares with companies like it.
- Your Score
- 68
- B2B SaaS median
- 71
- Top quartile
- 84+
Evidence Coverage 79%, against a B2B SaaS median of 79%.
Illustrative cohorts. Benchmarks are published once enough companies in a cohort have been scored.
Score history
- September 2026 drs-0.26879% coverage
- July 2026 drs-0.16478% coverage
- June 2026 drs-0.16174% coverage
History spans methodology versions. Scores from different versions are not directly comparable; each is kept as it was published.
Scores are re-run periodically. Continuous monitoring is what PageRadar SIGNAL is for.
Share this Score
Send it to the people who own the story: brand, communications, SEO, leadership.
Want to understand what’s lowering a Score?
PageRadar applies the Digital Reality Gap framework through search strategy, Digital Reality Audits, remediation and SIGNAL. A review starts from this Score and its 3 material gaps.
Digital Reality Score 68/100 and Evidence Coverage 79% were calculated on 14 Sep 2026 with methodology drs-0.2, from 63 observations across 17 sources. An automated Score cannot know every fact about a business: unknown claims stay unresolved rather than being treated as wrong. Read the methodology and the Digital Reality Gap framework it is built on.